Risks of Incorrect Anonymization

Risks of Incorrect or Incomplete Anonymization

Anonymization is often seen as a simple solution to data protection requirements. In practice, however, significant risks arise when data is only partially anonymized, incorrectly redacted or shared in the wrong context.

Anonymize texts and documents

Legal risks due to insufficient anonymization

From a legal point of view, it is decisive whether a personal reference is actually excluded. If this is not the case, all GDPR requirements continue to apply unchanged.

GDPR

Violation of GDPR

Incompletely anonymized data is still considered personal and is subject to all legal, purpose and data security obligations.

Liability

Liability and fines

Incorrect anonymization can lead to sanctions, fines and legal disputes.

Chart shows practical risks in everyday working life due to insufficient anonymization

Practical Risks in Day-to-Day Operations

In addition to legal consequences, there are also operational and organizational risks that burden processes and cooperation.

Accidental disclosure of sensitive information

Incorrectly redacted documents, visible metadata, or contextual information can reveal sensitive data and allow conclusions to be drawn about people or internal processes.

Lack of control when sharing documents

Risks arise from external transfer, internal circulation or multiple use of data. Without clear standards, errors are barely visible.

Why Incorrect Anonymization Poses a Real Risk

Even minor errors can result in data continuing to be personal and therefore fully covered by the GDPR.

Personal reference despite anonymization

As soon as re-identification is possible, all obligations of the GDPR continue to apply. This risk often results from incomplete redaction, contextual knowledge or too broad access rights.

Grafik zeigt, dass fehlerhafte Anonymisierung zur Re-Identifizierung führen kann und dadurch weiterhin ein DSGVO-Risiko besteht

How high is the individual risk?

Not every company is affected to the same extent. The actual risk situation depends on a number of factors. Typical influencing factors are:

1

Types of data and content sensitivity

The more sensitive the content, the higher the risk. Health data, contract information or confidential project files require stricter anonymization than general documents.

2

Frequency of sharing

The more frequently documents are shared internally or externally, the greater the likelihood of loss of context and undetected re-identifications.

3

Level of process automation

Manual work steps increase the error rate. Standardised and automated processes reduce risks and make results comprehensible.

4

Document formats and metadata

Different formats contain hidden information. Metadata, comments, or layers in PDFs can contain personal information, even if the text is blacked out.

Minimize risks — the next step

Would you like to reliably assess risks and derive clear measures? Use the demo for a practical assessment or request an individual consultation.

Further content

Data protection & GDPR

Get a general overview of data protection and the most important requirements of the GDPR.

Anonymize large amounts of data

Classification of risks and requirements for large amounts of data.

Further steps

Would you like to learn more about use cases, document types or the use of Project A? Get in touch with us — we will give you individual advice and show you the appropriate next steps.

Receive an offer
When you go to “Accept all” click, you agree to the storage of cookies on your device to improve navigation and support our marketing efforts. For more information, see our privacy policy.

Publications

Experiences, insights and more

Career portal

Vacancies

Project A

Anonymize texts and files

RESA

Transferring data to your SAP system